PATRIOT or Scoundrel

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul’s leg quivers, voice never wavering. The man jaws a 10 hour speech in an attempt to block the renewal of the PATRIOT act. Whether you’re an ultraconservative constitutionalist, or a dyed-in-the-wool democrat, it’s a critical point in a critical issue. The privacy of American citizens is in question, and up for discussion. The renewal of what is to some the most unwarranted intrusion of personal privacy, and to others something absolutely necessary to preserve freedom and liberty. According to the ACLU, 60% of people and in favor of revising the bill, while 34% say it should be reserved, with perhaps the missing 6% with no opinion. The bill was originally passed in 2001, with 357 to 66 in the House, and 98 to 1 in the Senate. Arguably the most controversial section of this bill is section 215. “Section 215 allows the government to obtain a secret court order requiring third parties, such as telephone companies, to hand over any records or other “tangible thing” if deemed “relevant” to an international terrorism.” That being said, that doesn’t justify the collection of our emails, and phone calls as average citizens as I don’t think the millions of people who have had their information scooped up by NSA are “Terrorists.”

Sections 215 and 702 are essentially what allowed the NSA to implement the PRISM program. It revised the FISA to allow more surveillance. Both controversial sections of the bill are remarkably broad. With all of this in mind, here we are. We have Rand Paul standing for 10 hours fighting to stop the renewal, and a small number of people pushing for it to be renewed unchanged. I might raise the question, why is there now suddenly a frantic failure? Nothing was accomplished, and the Senate went home for a week. You’d swear they forgot the bill was set to expire until a few days ago. It’s a true failure of duty, and now they are on vacation! This bill affects all Americans, and the nerve required to come up with this last minute, hot and bothered attempt at either revision or reinstatement is astounding.

In regards to both sides of the argument for and against the bill, I will quote Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers: “The noble enthusiasm of liberty is apt to be infected with a spirit of narrow and illiberal distrust. On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgment, their interest can never be separated.” How I wish for even an attempt at revision of the bill, and our senators are cozy in their homes. The task of amending the bill could hardly be given a deranged attempt before it expires on June 1st. Of course I’m sure the Senate was quite busy and they may, as I have said previously, have forgotten about this bill of utmost importance. Beyond all this nay-saying, it was found in a report by the US Department of Justice that the powers given to the FBI by the PATRIOT act have not helped solve any cases of terrorism. To those who blindly cling to this bill while it violates our rights to no avail, I say in the words of Samuel Johnson, Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

This article was written by Carson Bolter, a writer for dusk magazine. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: